Description
Panasonic Lumix GH7 Mirrorless Camera with 12-60mm f/2.8-4 Lens (DC-GH7L)
Package: Standard
Item details:
Brand new in retail box.
Sold by registered UK company.
We are a high rated retailer with a track record of excellent service.
We only sell high quality products.
A. J. Stevens (verified owner) –
September 2016 Size Name: 67 mm Verified Purchase Bought this filter to use with my Zeiss lens; I have used B+W filters before and have always been very pleased with the quality of build. Highly recommended. Read more One person found this helpful Helpful Report var metricsName = “DesktopCredibleBadgesInTopReviewsDetailPageCount” if(window.ue) { ue.count(metricsName, 0) } Graham Baré Five Stars Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 26 July 2017 Size Name: 95mm Verified Purchase A real enhancement for vivid colours. Read more One person found this helpful Helpful Report var metricsName = “DesktopCredibleBadgesInTopReviewsDetailPageCount” if(window.ue) { ue.count(metricsName, 0) } Tony Mac Four Stars Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 16 September 2015 Size Name: 67 mm Verified Purchase Great product and great service Read more One person found this helpful Helpful Report var metricsName = “DesktopCredibleBadgesInTopReviewsDetailPageCount” if(window.ue) { ue.count(metricsName, 0) } Nejad Good quality but not sure what it does Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 9 October 2019 Size Name: 49 mm Verified Purchase Unlike Japanese filters B+W filter frames are made of brass so if you accidentally hit something hard with your lens the filter frame breaks and not get jammed on the lens permanently. I tried this filter with my Leica M lens and camera and failed to notice any difference with or without it in any position. This is not to say that it’ll be the same on other camera makes or models. It could be that Leica’s Apochromatically corrected Aspheric lens’s already deliver what this filter suppose to do I’ve given 3 stars thinking that B+W should have tested the filter with various camera and lens and have produced compatibility list but it looks like they’re not interested. Read more 2 people found this helpful Helpful Report var metricsName = “DesktopCredibleBadgesInTopReviewsDetailPageCount” if(window.ue) { ue.count(metricsName, 0) } M.Y.V.I.E.W 2.0 out of 5 stars Smear marks and scratches on inner surfaces. Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 9 March 2020 Size Name: 86 mm Verified Purchase I could hardly believe it when I held this top class filter up to the light that there were smear marks covering virtually the whole of the rear surface of the front glass(see pictures). I don’t know how these marks will affect image quality, but it is of course impossible to clean these marks off as they are on the inside surface of the polarising filter. I requested a return and a replacement, but when it arrived the replacement was equally disappointing. Just like with the first filter, the rear of the front glass was covered in marks, only this time it was scratches instead of smear marks(see pictures). Again, I am not sure how these marks will affect image quality but from a company that boasts about flawless surfaces on its filters this is surely unacceptable. In all other respects these filters are great, solidly built etc but who wants their filters to be covered in smear marks and scratches. The replacement filter was returned for a refund. Read more M.Y.V.I.E.W 2.0 out of 5 stars Smear marks and scratches on inner surfaces. Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 9 March 2020 I could hardly believe it when I held this top class filter up to the light that there were smear marks covering virtually the whole of the rear surface of the front glass(see pictures). I don’t know how these marks will affect image quality, but it is of course impossible to clean these marks off as they are on the inside surface of the polarising filter. I requested a return and a replacement, but when it arrived the replacement was equally disappointing. Just like with the first filter, the rear of the front glass was covered in marks, only this time it was scratches instead of smear marks(see pictures). Again, I am not sure how these marks will affect image quality but from a company that boasts about flawless surfaces on its filters this is surely unacceptable. In all other respects these filters are great, solidly built etc but who wants their filters to be covered in smear marks and scratches. The replacement filter was returned for a refund. Images in this review function toggleSeeAllView() { P.when(‘A’, ‘cr-image-popover-controller’).execute(function(A, imagePopoverController) { imagePopoverController.toggleSeeAllView(true); }); } P.when(‘A’, ‘cr-image-popover-controller’).execute(function(A, imagePopoverController) { A.on(“a:popover:beforeShow:RBFWJVHHPUTXF_gallerySection_main”, function(data) { imagePopoverController.initImagePopover(“RBFWJVHHPUTXF”, “[https://m.media-Gadget Tree.com/images/I/61xiVUJSfTL.jpg, https://m.media-Gadget Tree.com/images/I/61cKyDhvf1L.jpg, https://m.media-Gadget Tree.com/images/I/71rDTmLS+QL.jpg, https://m.media-Gadget Tree.com/images/I/71tRdL6MhDL.jpg]”, data); }); }); 4 people found this helpful Helpful Report var metricsName = “DesktopCredibleBadgesInTopReviewsDetailPageCount” if(window.ue) { ue.count(metricsName, 0) } P. R. MacCabe 1.0 out of 5 stars Oh dear.. Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 24 October 2023 Size Name: 77 mm Verified Purchase Had this for about 5 mins before it had to be returned as the internal thread had jammed rendering it next to useless. Apparently B+W have a reputation for making top quality filters. Sadly on this occasion it failed miserably. Big disappointment. Read m